Adoption of the Virginia Constitution Essay

American History We the People I believe that the Virginia Constitution has the best chance to have a successful central government. This constitution has a good balance when it came to equality and liberty. This plan not only focuses on the good of the countries but it tries to make their decisions based off of what people need and want. All men are by nature equally free and independent, and have certain Inherent rights, of which, when they enter Into a state of society, they cannot by any compact deprive or divest their austerity; namely, the enjoyment of Life and Liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing Property, and pursuing and obtaining Happiness and Safety. All power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the People?magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them” (James Madison: The Madison Plan, 1787).

They care for the people opinion, and do not want their government to be ruled by one big powerful house. That Is why they divide the power Into three branches. “The Legislative, Executive, and Judiciary department, shall be separate ND distinct, so that neither exercise the powers properly belonging to the other: nor shall any person exercise the powers of more than one of them, at the same time” (The Virginia Constitution of 1776).

I think that spreading the power in any type of situation is always the best choice, not only because looking at different viewpoints opens the door to many different possibilities, but also because It minimizes the chance of war with a more powerful branch. Also, the powers try not to be cruel and hard on the people.

Excessive ball ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted, and general warrants, whereby an officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offence is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive, and ought not to be granted, and In controversies respecting property, and In suits between man and man, the ancient Trial by Jury Is referable to any other, and ought to be held sacred” (James Madison: The Madison Plan, 1787).

All of these statements show that this constitution is really trying to look out for the best of the people. They do not to have a monopolized power, but want an overall equally scattered power. Their group work seems like it would be the most effective in the long run. The reason why I did not choose the other plans was because they had one person hold all their power, did not give people much off ice, and had religion play an Important role In how their government should run. All persons who profess to believe in Jesus Christ, the Savior of the World, shall be capable to serve this government in any capacity, both legislatively and executive, he or they solemnly promising, when lawfully required, allegiance to the king as sovereign, and fidelity to the proprietor and governor, taking the oaths as now established” (The Pennsylvania Charter of Liberties, 1701). This was from the not respectable if they were not Christian. One of the articles also talks about who should be able to be voted into parliament. The House of Representatives of the freemen of this Commonwealth shall consist of persons most noted for wisdom and dirtied, to be chosen by the freemen of every city and county of this Commonwealth respectively’ (The Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776). I do not think that anyone agrees that “looking” a certain way can be an assumption of their intelligence. These are some of the reasons why I thought the Virginia Constitution was the most reasonable.