Homo adoption Essay

Children raised by gay couples will find it more difficult to learn appropriate gender roles in the absence of male and female role-models. Although not an exact match single parents provide a similar case where there has not been someone of the other gender as a role model. Although the evidence is not nearly as conclusive as Is often claimed 1 there have been many studies that have shown that two parents from deferent genders is beneficial to the child In Its developments. Similarly It Is often claimed that boys develop negative attitudes to study because there are very few ale teachers In primary schools.

Numerous studies have shown that children do best when they are raised by two married, biological parental . In the case of adopted children that Is Impossible, but a man and a woman Is the best approximation of that family. Since that Is the best environment to raise children, the government has to encourage and promote these traditional unions, not undermine them. Allowing gay couples to legally become parents, would legally and socially redefine what a family is and society as a whole may suffer.

Children who are adopted already face bullying and exclusion in school because of their difference, placing them in same-sex households will double their exclusion and make their lives much harder than if placed in an opposite-sex household. The focus of this debate should not be on gay rights, but on what is in the best interest of the adopted child. The adoption process’ goal is to find the most suitable parents for that child, not to resolve other social inequalities and injustices. Being raised in a traditional family, by a mother and father, is the best environment for a hill.

Studies have shown that children who are raised by homosexual couples can have problems with substance abuse, violence and ‘at risk’ behavior. Therefore the state has the obligation to try to provide the child with that environment. Lust because the government will protect people’s right to have a family from outside interference, and will publicly fund the treatment of a medical condition, such as Infertility, it doesn’t mean the government has to give children to those who don’t or are unable to have any in order to protect their right to a family life. E scientific debate Is not as settled as proponents of gay rights claim. The studies, Lully positive In their conclusions, have generally been based on very small samples, not more than a dozen families. Some experts claim that there Is also a volunteer bias, with the subjects of these studies usually supportive of the gay rights agenda and therefore keen on reporting positive results. Lastly, the researchers themselves can be biased and willing to find evidence to back a political agenda . Homo adoption ay phantom gender as a role model.

Although the evidence is not nearly as conclusive as is often claimed there have been many studies that have shown that two parents from different genders is beneficial to the child in its developments. Similarly it is often male teachers in primary schools. Married, biological parental . In the case of adopted children that is impossible, but a man and a woman is the best approximation of that family. Since that is the best rhea focus of this debate should not be on gay rights, but on what is in the best interest of the adopted child. The adoption process’ goal is to find the most suitable

Child. Studies have shown that children who are raised by homosexual couples can interference, and will publicly fund the treatment of a medical condition, such as infertility, it doesn’t mean the government has to give children to those who don’t or rhea scientific debate is not as settled as proponents of gay rights claim. The studies, Nile positive in their conclusions, have generally been based on very small samples, not more than a dozen families. Some experts claim that there is also a volunteer and therefore keen on reporting positive results.